Science: Disagreement Among Experts: Are We Closer To “Dragon Man” Than Neanderthals?

In the end, does “Dragon Man” from China resemble more than Neanderthals? Harbin’s skull leads researchers to suspect this. A German anthropologist disagrees with this view.

at China She found that the skull could belong to a human lineage more closely related to modern humans than to Neanderthals. This is the result of an international research group led by Xijun Ni and Qiang Ji from Hebei Geo University in Shijiazhuang (China). Scientists even described the fossil in the journal The Innovation as representing a new species of hominid. However, this assessment will spark debate, says Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig.

The Dragon Man had a short, flat face with small cheekbones

The skull was found in 1933 while working on a bridge in the northern Chinese city of Harbin, but only a few years earlier it was given to scientists by the descendants of its discoverer. “The Harbin fossil is one of the most complete skull fossils in the world,” the newspaper quoted Jie in a letter from the magazine. The skull has preserved many anatomical details necessary to understand the evolution of the human race and the origin of Homo sapiens.

Researchers have discovered both ancient and modern features of the skull: a skull volume of 1,420 milliliters is comparable to that of humans today, and a short, flat face with small cheekbones is more compatible with Homo sapiens. On the other hand, according to the researchers, the elongated and flat hat, strong bulges above the eyes, deep eye sockets and large molars are more reminiscent of older people. “Overall, the Harbin skull gives us more clues to understand homologous diversity and evolutionary relationships between these different types of humans and populations,” Ni says.

See also  Wildlife: When a donkey digs for water

Harbin’s skull is at least 146,000 years old

The scientists examined small deposits of earth on the skull as well as soil at the exact location. They found good agreement and determined an age of between 138,000 and 309,000 years for the corresponding terrestrial stratum through geochemical investigations. Dating uranium and thorium indicates an age of at least 146,000 years. Accordingly, Harbin man could have been a contemporary of other pardoned people in today’s China, whose bones are found at Xiahe (age: at least 160,000 years old), Jinniushan (at least 200,000 years old), Dali (240,000 to 327,000 years old) and Hualongdong (265,000 years) to 345,000 years ago.

From their genetics analyzes, Ni, Jie, and colleagues conclude that said fossils belong to a group of people who are somewhat more closely related to Homo sapiens than to Neanderthals. The researchers wrote that because China stretches across so many climatic zones, these people must have been highly adaptable. “Our analyzes also suggest a possible link between Harbin’s skull and the mandible Shikha, a fossil attributed to the Denisova lineage,” said one of the three studies. However, part of the research group announced that the Harbin skull belonged to a new species of human, “Homo longi” (“dragon man”), named after the geographical name of Longjiang of the province in which it was found.

The classification of “Homo longi” does not get much understanding from colleagues

This classification meets with little understanding by Leipzig-Hüblin anthropologist: “This goes against everything we have learned in anthropology over the past ten years.” Although not all research results are accessible, based on published studies, it is assumed that the Harbin people, like many other hominin finds from China, are Denisovans.

See also  Flag - Moles like "Porsche Turbo Engines" - Wikipedia

The remains of the Denisova people were found in the Altai Mountains of Central Asia and in Tibet, traces of the genetic material of the Denisovans were found in various peoples of East Asia and Australia. Denisovans are referred to as a sister group to Neanderthals, and the discoverers did not classify him as a separate human species at the time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.